South Korea Heads to the 9th Nationwide Local Elections on June 3: Elections and Social Impact

-

 On June 3, 2025, South Korea held its 21st Presidential Election. Tomorrow, June 3, 2026 (Korea Standard Time), the country will hold its 9th Nationwide Local Elections.

 

Anyone who has recently visited South Korea may have noticed the lively atmosphere surrounding the election campaign season. Elections are not only an opportunity for citizens to choose policies that will shape the future of their communities and express their political beliefs. From a social impact perspective, elections are also a moment when people can express their views on how social problems should be addressed and how the broader social ecosystem should be sustained through their vote.

 

In this article, on the eve of the 9th Nationwide Local Elections (hereafter referred to as the “local elections”), I would like to explore why elections are closely connected to the social impact ecosystem.

 

Before diving into the discussion, it may be helpful to briefly explain how elections work in South Korea. The country uses a direct election system, meaning voters cast their ballots directly for candidates. Any citizen who is eligible to vote can participate in the election. As a result, candidates spend long days meeting voters and campaigning from early morning until late at night.

 

The local elections taking place on June 3 will determine both local council members and local government leaders. Voters cast their ballots for candidates running in the jurisdiction where their official residence is registered.

 

🌱Elections Are More Than a Change in Political Leadership

 

During election season, public attention is often focused on who will win. News outlets, social media, and everyday conversations become filled with discussions, predictions, and debates about the outcome.

 

For people working in the social impact sector, however, elections represent something more significant than a change in political leadership. They are one of the largest opportunities for social issues to enter public debate.

 

Many of the key issues that emerge during election campaigns are closely related to the challenges that social impact organizations work on every day. For this reason, politics and public policy inevitably have a major influence on the social impact ecosystem.

 

For example, housing affordability is one of South Korea’s most pressing social issues, and social housing initiatives have emerged as one approach to addressing it. Challenges related to population aging and long-term care are being tackled through cooperative care services and community-based social solidarity economy models. Climate change is also being addressed through innovative business approaches that go far beyond traditional environmental activities such as litter collection and recycling campaigns.

 

As a result, election platforms often include policies designed to address the social issues that residents experience in their daily lives. The role that social impact organizations play as practical problem-solvers can also change depending on the policy priorities established through elections.

 

🌿Elections Are Not the End

 

In my experience, the social impact sector in South Korea has often been significantly affected by changes in political leadership and policy environments.

 

That is why elections should not be viewed as an endpoint.

 

The goal should be to build an ecosystem that remains stable and independent regardless of which political party or local government leader takes office. While people may hold different political beliefs and values, most political leaders ultimately seek solutions to the challenges facing their communities.

 

In this context, social impact organizations—positioned between the public and market sectors—play a unique role. Regardless of who holds political office, these organizations continue working on the ground to address social challenges. Their ability to consistently serve communities allows them to make meaningful contributions to solving social problems over the long term.

 

🍀Conclusion

 

This election is an important opportunity for citizens to help determine the future direction of their communities. The social issues that social impact organizations seek to address—and must continue addressing—will remain long after the election is over.

 

From a social impact perspective, elections are one starting point for social change. Before elections and after them, social impact organizations continue their work every day, developing practical solutions and striving to create positive change in society.

 

This is why elections and the social impact ecosystem are deeply interconnected.


👉Read related articles

The Impact of My Vote on Social Change: Elections and Social Impact

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Viewed Posts

The Power of Value Proven by Numbers: Why “Impact Measurement” Has Become Important

-
Image
  Korean social impact organizations pursue both “social value” and “profit” at the same time. In other words, they create social value through business methods. Because of this, many social impact organizations in Korea were often positively recognized simply for having “good intentions.” In particular, activities such as creating jobs for vulnerable groups or solving community problems were considered meaningful in themselves.   However, as the social impact ecosystem gradually expanded, it became increasingly difficult to fully explain the role and achievements of organizations through “good intentions” alone. Especially during the previous administration, as greater emphasis was placed on the self-reliance and sustainability of the social and solidarity economy and social innovation organizations, this atmosphere spread even further.   Around 2022, the importance of impact measurement — proving “what changed and how” — began to receive serious attention. Korea...
Read more

How Communities Create Change: Interview with a Community Expert (Part 2)

-
Image
Nahyunhong, a community leader running a social economy network in Korea (Photo courtesy of Nahyunhong)   In the previous article, we explored how “connection” takes shape in the field of social economy and social innovation through an interview with Na Hyunhong, a community expert working in Korea’s social impact sector. We examined how online communities and open chat rooms — relatively lightweight formats — have expanded into nationwide networks. 👀Read Part 1 of the Interview The Power That Connects Korea’s Social Economy Ecosystem: Community Expert Interview (Part 1) In this second installment, we take a step further through Na Hyunhong’s interview to examine what connection truly means on the ground. We look more closely at the principles and philosophies that guide community building, as well as what is needed for Korea’s social impact ecosystem to grow sustainably. Going beyond the idea of community as simply a gathering space, this interview asks how communities actually...
Read more

Why Finance Should Be Driven by Values: The Move Toward a Value-Based Financial Cooperative

-
Image
  In a previous post, I explored how Korea’s traditional community practice of “gye” has evolved into modern forms of social finance.   👉Related article Korea’s Traditional Community Finance “Gye”: Its Expansion into Social Finance (Part 1)   From Traditional Gye to Social Finance in Korea (Part 2) On the 20th, the 2026 Global Forum on Value-Based Finance was held, where a declaration for promoting a value-based financial cooperative was presented. This reflects a growing effort to create a financial system that operates not only on profit, but on values.   In this post, I will share key discussions from the forum and examine why finance should be guided by social purpose.   Poster of the Global Forum on Value-Based Finance held on the 20th(Source: Social Innovation Entrepreneur Network) Why Do We Need a Value-Based Financial Cooperative?   To some extent, the question of “why” has already been addressed in previous posts. However, it i...
Read more